Tuesday, October 9, 2007

The Pillow-Gun Sign

I've heard many stories of people who supposedly sleep with a "gun under their pillow." I'm not sure if this is actually true, but I do know some people who actually sleep within arm's length of a gun. I'm sure there are many people who sleep with a gun underneath the bed or - as we've all seen on TV - in a drawer in the lamp stand next to the bed.

If you ask someone who sleeps next to a gun why they do it, you'll almost assuredly get "protection" as a response - meaning home & family protection. A single female might have a different definition of protection, so we'll just cover couples and heads-of-household type folks (who are probably more likely to have a gun for home protection anyway...)

You know, I'm all for protection, but doesn't this mean that if someone comes into your house trying to rob you and/or murder your family, you'll have a gun next to you to scare (or even "disable") the criminal? Of course that's the idea - the gun will prevent a criminal that is already in your house from doing further damage to you or your family.

What people seem to be forgetting though, is that the best way to fight a criminal is before they get into your house.

Unfortunately, criminals breaking into your house have no idea how much of a badass you are because the gun is hidden underneath your pillow. Wouldn't it make much, much more sense to alert criminals early on that you're a gun-totin' ass-kicker? If they knew that you were going to shoot them in the home-field-advantage darkness of your own home, they wouldn't even come inside, right?

Exactly. So what I'm selling now is a sign you can place on your front lawn that says, "My Other Wife is a Shotgun," or something similarly hilarious, along with a picture of a person sleeping with a gun under his pillow. Before criminals even come into your house, they'll know that you're a nut with a pillow-gun that's ready to shoot burglars on sight and they'll leave you and your house alone. There - yet another problem solved by the private sector.

I know your neighbors might think you're an asshole for having a threatening sign on your lawn, but you don't want to get robbed, right? I mean, you've seen those dramatic reenactments on TV where the family is attacked during the night, bound and beaten, while robbers steal all the stuff, right? Good, because that's what I'm thinking about while I write the rest of this post...

Here, I made a sign that I'm sure someone, somewhere would find funny enough to put on their lawn:

---

But wait... What about unintended consequences?

Let's assume our goal is to minimize burglary of your house as well as bodily injury, and the burglar's goal is to maximize his take, or booty, or whatever the hell the kids are calling it these days.

While normal burglars will avoid your house while you're in it if you've got a sign that warns them of your willingness to use your gun, the burglars that are willing to kill for your possessions will take the chance regardless. In fact, they'll most likely appreciate the warning sign on your lawn and they'll hesitate less when they burst into your bedroom firing. Why? Well, if they didn't think you had a gun, they might feel less pressed to murder your family. If they knew you had a gun, the choice to murder you is much, much simpler and should be taken as a given.

There's one problem. Here's another:

While the real security nuts will be the early adopters of my "I Sleep With a Gun Under My Pillow," or Pillow-Gun, lawn signs, after some time there would people who don't sleep with guns under their pillows that put the signs out on their lawns. (Their houses were being robbed at proportionally higher rates than houses with signs out front... Solution: Get a sign!). Pretty soon, everyone who does not want to be robbed will have a sign on their lawn.

So the final hypothetical equilibrium is a world in which everyone has a sign on their lawn that threatens criminals with gun violence. Makes sense, right?

An important thing to realize is that, while the world changes from our current sign-less equilibrium to one where everyone's got a sign, we'd see a reduction in the number of nighttime petty robbers; we'd see less nighttime burglary committed by thieves that don't (or can't) carry guns. They wouldn't just give up though - if they're planning to rob your house, they'll just do it when you're not home. I'll call these guys "Daytime" thieves from now own, and we'll come back to this in a bit.

On the other side of the spectrum, the trip from our current equilibrium to the total-sign equilibrium should also provide an incentive for "nighttime" burglars to carry guns. This is pretty obvious, I think, but just in case you disagree: We're assuming that pillow-guns are used to fight off burglars who (for some reason) rob your house during the night while you're sleeping in it; these burglars have clearly decided that they're more worried about outside people seeing them burglarize than they are about you finding them. This seems to suggest that nighttime burglars are willing to take the additional risk to "immobilize" their victims in order to avoid the risk of being seen by impossible-to-immobilize neighbors. If they knew you didn't have a gun, immobilize might mean "use a lead pipe and some rope, or a baseball bat." However, if they knew you did have a gun, immobilize would have to mean kill.

So, for those nighttime criminals who would rather not kill you for your possessions, the lawn sign diverts them to less efficient daytime robbery. But for those nighttime criminals that value your possession more than they value your life, the lawn sign means that they can't take any risks in immobilizing you. The sign provides the extra incentive needed for a burglar to carry a gun instead of a lead pipe.

So let's compare the two extremes:

1. Nobody shows "signs" of carrying a gun (AKA completely concealed weapons): We'll have just about the same number of total burglars as we have now. We'll have slightly more nighttime thieves, though - who are more worried about being seen by neighbors than they are of being caught by you, especially when there's low risk of you carrying a gun - and they'll rob your house and take your stuff based on what they think you have inside your house, just like they're apparently doing now. Compared to the other equilibrium, though, daytime thieves are relatively more careless now when it comes to robbing your house when you're not home (I'll explain more in a bit.)

-or-

2. Everybody shows "signs" that warn of pillow-guns: We'll have a separating equilibrium with nighttime burglaries committed by thieves that are willing to "deal" with your gun threat while robbing your house (even if you're lying about having a gun - they don't want to take the chance), while the remaining burglars will become daytime thieves, provided the added inefficiency of timing the homeowners' schedules and figuring out elaborate schemes to not get caught by neighbors doesn't override the value they place on your possessions. If your possessions are valuable enough, they'll figure out a way to get them, day or night.

Let's simplify even further.

If you, personally, decide to put up a pillow-gun sign out in front of your house, you'll ultimately get the following (we're dealing with probability here):

A)
A decrease in the number of nighttime burglars.
B) A nearly-equivalent increase in the number of daytime burglars (not all nighttime burglars would switch burglary times.)
C) An increase in the incentives for burglars to become more calculating & patient.
D) An increase in the odds of being killed during a burglary.

If, on the other hand, you choose not to put out a pillow-gun sign and burglars perceive no threat of gun violence, we'll get:

A) An increase in less violent nighttime burglars (ones that'll ignore you ...or maybe they'll use "a lead pipe & rope.")
B) A nearly-equivalent decrease in daytime burglars.
C) No extra incentive for nighttime thieves to become calculating and/or more patient daytime burglars - they'll be relatively more careless.
D) A decrease in the odds of being killed.

The most important difference between the two situations is going to depend almost solely on the perceived value of the stuff in your house. If you increase the perceived value of your possessions, the number of total burglaries (as far as your house is concerned) is equivalent in both scenarios.

Why? If you are perceived to own "worthless crap," the thieves that would have switched from nighttime burglary to daytime burglary will not put out the extra effort to rob you during the day, and we'll have slightly less total burglaries in this case. If, on the other hand, you are perceived to own valuable stuff, the thieves that are scared off by pillow-gun signs will put out the extra effort to rob you during the day, and will get basically an equivalent number of total robberies (more daytime and less nighttime, but same number).

So here's the answer: If your house looks terrible from the outside and potential thieves believe you have nothing worthwhile to steal, putting a pillow-gun sign out on your lawn will probably slightly decrease your chances of being robbed, and increase the odds for someone else.

...But if your house looks expensive and appears to contain very valuable stuff, putting a pillow-gun sign on your lawn will likely have no effect on your chances of getting robbed, but it will increase the odds that you'll be murdered during a robbery (instead of tied up & beaten, or even ignored.)

So don't buy a Pillow-Gun Sign, and don't let anyone know you've got a gun underneath your pillow, either. That is, of course, unless you've got a death wish and/or a house full of junk that needs to get stolen while you're at work.

---

This one seems a little violent, but probably gets the point across. It also might be a little too ironic:

If anyone can think of better slogans for the Pillow-Gun signs, please let me know so I can trademark them. ...And I've already thought of "Keep Honking, I'm Reloading... The Gun Under My Pillow."

---

You know, the whole point of this post is to present an argument against the pro-gun types who say a populace full of weapon owners is better for the safety of everyone. This is a common argument I hear against gun control laws - and I disagree, clearly. While I'm against excessive gun control, I'm more against a society full of "vocal gun owners." Owning a gun shouldn't be a stand-alone threat against humanity, it should be well thought out, private & personal response to the threat the world seems to pose to you. I'd argue that this threat is shockingly minimal, and not owning a gun provides incentives for other, more effective safety precautions, but if you really believe you need to own a gun, you'll probably benefit infinitely more from the psychological confidence than you would from actually ever using it.

Unfortunately, the more vocal you are in your gun ownership, the more other people (...your children...) perceive society as a whole to be a threat. I'd say that, right there - the perception of threat - is a huge contributor to a lot of our irrational fears in this country...


---

UPDATE 10/16/07: Darrell sent me this link, which explains the next best thing to sleeping with a gun underneath your head. It gets funnier the more I think about it...

24 comments:

Anonymous said...

"And the sign said anybody caught trespassing would be shot on sight
So I jumped on the fence and yelled at the house, Hey! what gives you the right?"

Disposable Info said...

Long Haired Freaky People Need Not Worry About Not Experiencing the Wrath of the Gun Under My Pillow

Unknown said...

"Happiness is a warm gun..."

I suppose this is only true in the bedroom...at least in this case...

Darrell said...

Wow, you really came around to a great point there at the end -- perceived threats are far more pernicious than actual ones.

Lest I go on a diatribe about taking off one's shoes at the airport, I'll switch to a point you implied in the meat of the post: that advertising gun ownership will attract only the most dangerous and violent burglars. Our antiseptic, antibacterial society has attracts only the most dangerous and adaptive pathogens.

Thus, the reason for not putting a gun-pillow sign outside your house is similar to the reason for not washing your hands. Stop handwashing, people!

-Darrell

Anonymous said...

I'm pretty sure I Have a Gun signs are unnecessary in Wyoming. Everyone is assumed to own several guns. These folks don't generally keep them around solely for protection, though, which makes them (theoretically) more dangerous to burglars since they tend to use them every year for deer season (and elk season, and antelope season, and turkey season...).

When I lived alone I slept with a bread knife under a nearby pillow. Not the pillow I used, because a metal object under my pillow would be not be conducive to sleeping. I guess it's the thought that counts.

Disposable Info said...

That's a damn good point, Darrell - I think someone published a study recently that anti-bacterial hand soap actually helps breed bacteria. I don't remember the details though...

And Gretchen: That's a good choice of weapon. I was trying to think of the perfect non-lethal weapon I would use if I had to choose one, and decided on baseball bat. I think bread knife trumps baseball bat, though, now that you mention it.

...And scissors cut bread knife (they're sharp). But baseball bat beats scissors. I think I have that right...

Anonymous said...

So Dave, I know I add a lot of requests without actually providing any worthwhile discussion on your topics. I promise this will be the last one. What's the deal with the music industry and record labels, and the idea that they are dying?

Anonymous said...

In an economic sense?

Disposable Info said...

I'm gonna take that challenge, Zane - as soon as I gain an informed opinion, which I will, dammit.

Before I do, though, let me say a couple things:

The Radiohead pay-what-you-want idea, which seems to suggest that record labels aren't necessary, is exactly the opposite. Radiohead is using the ploy to search for a new label (or so I've heard) - and even a band that can generate TONS of publicity on its own still needs a record label. [as an aside, Radiohead is making a lot more money from consumer generosity, credit card fees, the exchange rate and the publicity than they would from the traditional record label route. Unfortunately, it'll only work this one time, so now they need a label... Makes sense, right?]

Second, I'm not so sure that record labels are really "dying." It is far, far, far, far, far more likely that the popularity of "Indie" music has already been harnessed (if not designed) by major labels. If "Indie" = profit, then it means that major record labels have changed their name to include "Indie."

The only way the record companies can die, therefore, is if they are somehow driven out of business by billions of tiny, UNPROFITABLE independent labels. Ignoring the fact that this is near impossible, if this were the case, the populace wouldn't be buying more CDs (actual CDs, not downloads) than ever right now - competition should (would) drive the cost of music down to near-zero in the case of billions of "indie" labels, and that's clearly not what's going on. In fact, the opposite is occurring, suggesting major record labels are more powerful than ever.

Come to think of it, I'm pretty satisfied that this is the case. It makes sense, too, considering the countless examples we have of misleading branding. Think about how easy it is for a company to just put out a new product and hide the fact that they created it...

So that covers my whole point, actually. I could try researching a little more, but I'm (now) fairly confident... I was about to do a post to answer the request, Zane, but I started typing in this comment box and couldn't stop.

So whaddya think? Did I miss anything? I'm not too informed in the matter, but from the perspective of economic logic, I think I've formed a new opinion...

Disposable Info said...

Here's another good point that illustrates my arguments, I think:

Ever heard of Marie Digby? She was (is) this big star on YouTube, and everyone was so proud, bragging and feeling empowered against corporate America because Youtube viewers had found a star and made her popular, not the major record labels.

Whatta you know, the Wall Street Journal comes out and ruins the party for everyone: Apparently she had been signed by Hollywood Records for years, and the company not only came up with the Youtube video ideas and songs, they also helped promote the idea of "independent individual musician rising through the ranks of the non-corporate market."

So, not only can a major label spinoff smaller, "independent" labels, they can also hide behind a single individual. Now that's clever, and further evidence that, as long as consumers are willing to pay for music, we'll have artists and major labels that are working in cohorts to convert art into profit.

I have no problem with this idea, by the way - It's the best way to disseminate the maximum amount of music to largest number of people.

Unfortunately, my personal tastes differ with those of the majority of the market... But that's a story for another day...

Anonymous said...

That's kinda what I thought you would say, which is good. I get tired of the whiny music fan arguments over the issue.

Thanks.

Unknown said...

So exactly what model of gun does the music industry sleep with again?

Unknown said...

Almost forgot...

Dave - I would have normally emailed you this, but since you mentioned Marie Digby, I thought I would share more publically. When a colleague of mine found out I had entered the blogging world, he forwarded me to a blog that he enjoys. After visiting the site I couldn't help but think of you in regards to your favorite politician for the upcoming presidential election. Enjoy!

Disposable Info said...

As much as I'm willing to give Ron Paul credit for tricking people into thinking he's worthy, I really, really hate the Ron Paul girl. Hate is a strong word, but I think it's applicable here.

Unknown said...

Not to mimic Zane - but that's what I thought you would say...hehehe

Josh said...

i'll assume you're eating a steady diet of ramen at this point. never fear. just another week and a half, and we'll have some more hot dogs for ya

Disposable Info said...

Funny enough, I'm on an all hot dog diet - so I'll have to bring some Ramen to barbecue...

Chris Jeffords said...

Interesting idea.

I would go with "Shank under my pillow" or even "Machete under my pillow." That at least lets a potential robber know that you are not only willing to defend your person and property but that you are probably a little insane.

May I recommend "Big Man With A Gun" by NIN.

Unknown said...

You know, I've always found it funny when people get a dog for "protection". When was the last time someone has domesticated a dog to be a form of protection. I think if you want a domestic pet, and protection - acquire a de-scented skunk. Apparently they have the same type of attitude as a cat, they can be trained to go in a litter box, but I can guarantee you, a perp walks in and sees a skunk, they'll run.

Now that's true protection! And you get a pet out of the deal...who needs a weapon? Win-Win

Disposable Info said...

You know Chris & Fred - if we combine a little insanity with a noise-making distraction and add a de-scented skunk to the mix, then we get the best idea for a home security system in the history of man.

If someone's breaking into your house and a speaker system starts blasting "Big Man With a Gun" at 130+ decibels while a skunk is running across the living room, I guarantee you, even if the criminal felt especially murderous, they'd reverse direction and get the hell out of the neighborhood.

We should market this combination. I can picture it now: a skunk in a box with a label advertising a Shank and a picture of Trent Reznor being "violent" (which I've never seen, by the way, but if he tried, he could scare the hell out of me...)

Anonymous said...

What if you have a pillow gun sign and display statistics of how many times you were robbed and how many robbers you killed! Because if some one is breaking into my house I shoot to kill so I that the chances the robber tries to sue me are decreased and its my word against a dead pile of goo! The pillow sign would also have a picture of a dog with big sharp teeth that says if I am not home Rover is! Maybe we can also add a pet bird to the sign that says if rover is sleeping and you try to break in the pet bird will notice and screetch waking up rover who will be very angry! I guess you will need a big sign. in fine print at the bottom of the sign it could have the message "Warning as you can see I am very creative and a bit crazy so you can imagine that I have other precuations to protect my house that will maime or kill you!" I think that should do the trick! Wait maybe we can add a moat for those robbers who don't like water.

Disposable Info said...

I totally agree with every one of those ideas. I'm not too sure about the moat, though, as people might take it as a sign that you've got something really special hidden inside your house (like Excalibur) & they'd probably be more tempted to break in... I would...

Anonymous said...

The advertisement is great. With all of those shots of kindly hunters and matronly types putting the shotgun into the rack, I loved, loved, loved the lone shot of someone taking the gun out of the rack.

Disposable Info said...

Oh, man, that's funny - I didn't even notice that one time the guy's picking the gun up...

Darrell pointed out the end of the commercial: "Many customers are buying one for each side of the bed!" which is freakin' hilarious.

But I need to point out this line:

"You'll get the valuable time that may be needed to adequately protect you and your home, it's the smartest money you'll spend in your life."

Because you don't even have one second to think before you pull that trigger! Shoot first, let your intelligent money ask all the questions later...